REFERENCIAS
 
  1. Anderson, D.R.y Patella, V.M.: Automatic Static Perimetry. 2ª ed. Mosby. St.Louis. 1999.
  2. Benjumeda, A.: Glaucomatología para especialistas no especializados. Barcelona. 2000 En: Drance SM, Anderson DR (eds): Automated perimetry in glaucoma. A practical guide. Grune & Stratton. Orlando. 1985 (161-173).
  3. Heijl, A.: The glaucomatous visual field. En Weinreb, R.N.: Kitazawa,Y. y Krieglenstein, G.K.ed.: Glaucoma in the 21st Century. Harcourt . London. 2000
  4. Heijl, A.; Lindgren,G.; Olsson, J.: Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch.Ophthalmol.,105;1544-1549, 1987
  5. Hutchings N, Hosking SL, Wild JM, Flanagan JG.: Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., 42; 2332-2337, 2001
  6. Johnson, C. A. : What is progression of visual field loss ?. En Weinreb, R.N.; Kitazawa,Y. y Krieglenstein, G.K.ed.: Glaucoma in the 21st Century. Harcourt . London. 2000
  7. Katz, J.; Congdon, N.y Friedman, D.A.: Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch.Ophthalmol.,117; 1137-1142, 1999
  8. Morales,J.; Weitzman,M.L.; González de la Rosa,M.: Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and Octopus Threshold Perimetry. Ophthalmology 107; 134–142, 2000
 
Anterior  |  Siguiente ]     [ Arriba  |  Primero  |  Último ]     (Article 23 of 23)